Consistently improves maximal strength
Across decades of trials, adding creatine to resistance training reliably increases strength and power output beyond training alone — the effect the research is most confident about.
Research
Two questions decide whether a creatine is worth taking: does the molecule work, and is the powder in the tub actually what it claims? The first is answered by four decades of published science. The second is answered by the Crealean® certificate.
The molecule
Creatine monohydrate is the most-researched supplement in sports science — the rare case where the evidence arrived before the hype.
What the science says
A tour of where the research on creatine is strongest — and where it’s still being written.
Across decades of trials, adding creatine to resistance training reliably increases strength and power output beyond training alone — the effect the research is most confident about.
By enabling more quality training volume and improving cell hydration, creatine is associated with greater increases in lean body mass over a training block.
Studies of short, maximal, repeated efforts show less drop-off between bouts — directly relevant to team and field sports.
Evidence points to reduced markers of muscle damage and faster restoration of energy stores when creatine is taken consistently.
Because the brain runs on the same ATP system, researchers are actively studying creatine for cognition under fatigue, sleep deprivation, and healthy aging.
Creatine monohydrate is among the most-studied supplements in existence, with a large body of evidence supporting daily use in healthy adults.
These are plain-language summaries of the published literature on creatine monohydrate, provided for education. They are not medical advice — if you have a health condition or take medication, talk to your doctor before supplementing.
Effect ranges quoted across this site summarise the published literature on creatine monohydrate — principally the International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand on creatine supplementation (Kreider et al., Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2017) and the trials and systematic reviews it reviews. Figures are typical reported ranges across study populations, not a promise of individual results.
The research behind the mark
Great research on creatine is worthless if the powder in the tub isn’t the real thing. Here’s the testing that stands behind the trademark.
Each batch is assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography to confirm it meets the 99.99% purity the label claims.
We screen for the by-products that separate premium creatine from commodity powder — dicyandiamide, dihydrotriazine — plus heavy metals.
Micronization is checked against a 200-mesh standard so every tub disperses clean rather than settling into grit.
Results are recorded against a batch code printed on the tub — the certificate of analysis is the mark's proof, not a marketing line.
Sample batch reference: CRL-2408-99A · assayed at 99.99%.
Proof, not promises
See what Crealean® stands for and how to put it to work.